Difference between revisions of "Talk:Religion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I love this page. You put like, 2.76 ass-loads of work into it. I think as soon as we get some more of the images filled in, it should definitely be a featured article. {{User:Buddy13/sig}} 13:35, 15 July 2006 (PDT) | I love this page. You put like, 2.76 ass-loads of work into it. I think as soon as we get some more of the images filled in, it should definitely be a featured article. {{User:Buddy13/sig}} 13:35, 15 July 2006 (PDT) | ||
:Heh heh, yeah, if any of my DVD software let me take screenshots I'd have probably put in a couple more arse-loads. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 21:01, 15 July 2006 (PDT) | :Heh heh, yeah, if any of my DVD software let me take screenshots I'd have probably put in a couple more arse-loads. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 21:01, 15 July 2006 (PDT) | ||
::Hmm, I just found a program on my computer I didn't know about. I ''can'' do screenshots. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 02:22, 16 July 2006 (PDT) |
Revision as of 11:22, 16 July 2006
the remains of a computerised space probe that collided with God?
I'm not sure we can call him that. I mean, from what I understood, he was pretty much agreeing with whatever Bender said, sort of telling him what he wanted to hear... I mean, after all, how does a space probe collide with God? It's nutty. It could be any number of things, including a galaxy that signals in binary, actually God (or a god), a galactic supercomputer, or whatever else is conceivable... Just my thoughts... Buddy13 16:45, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
- Yeah I just went with that for a name because that's the best explanation of who/what it is. Then again it only seems probably that that is correct. I guess renaming the entry "God(?)" would work. Or "Shuban God", it does fit the Monk's religion. - Quolnok 22:52, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
- Maybe something a bit more vague like "Galactic Entity"... Buddy13 23:52, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
Featured Article
I love this page. You put like, 2.76 ass-loads of work into it. I think as soon as we get some more of the images filled in, it should definitely be a featured article. Buddy13 13:35, 15 July 2006 (PDT)